Written and posted by Jean-Louis. 3/2012 Original written in 1995.
First, let me state that my views do not stem from misogynous feelings and bias.
My
premise comes from the prayer of our Lord Jesus when He taught his
disciples to pray at their request. Let’s examine Matthew 6:10 which
declares: “Thy kingdom come, thy will be done on earth as it is in heaven”.
I. Kingdom authority
How is our Father’s will accomplished in heaven?
Partly through his servants, the holy angels or messengers.
In any kingdom and any army there are different levels of authority and
a chain of command. For instance, the Lord Jesus appeared to Joshua in a
theophany and referred to himself as the Captain of the host. Joshua
5:14 or later on as Lord of Sabaoth or Lord of the armies of heaven in
Romans 9:29. So, here we have the Father King, Jesus Christ, the son,
Prince who is also the King. He has the function and title of Captain of
the armies of angels.
II. Roles of Christians under delegated authority
Now, how is the Father’s will accomplished on the earth?
Through men at different levels of authority going through a chain of command.
In Philippians 2:25, Paul referred to Epaphroditus as a fellow worker and a fellow soldier. Also, in II Timothy 2:3, Paul asks Timothy to suffer hardship with him as a good soldier of Christ. Of course, generally speaking we are all, men and women, soldiers of Christ in his spiritual army.
Throughout
the ages, it has always been man’s role to fight in wars. It has only
been since the feminist revolution that women have demanded to play a
role as active combatants. Women have always participated in the
military in different capacities where they could use their much-needed
skills. They possess God-given abilities that sometimes are lacking in
men. There are however, examples in the Bible and in history when women
have risen to positions of power in a military situation. I can think of
two instances, one is Deborah the Judge in the Old Testament and the
other one is Joan of Arc of France who led the French army against
British invaders during the first half of the 15th century AD. I personally think that God raised Deborah to shame the men who were not valiant enough to defend Israel.
B. Function of the worker
In Philippians, Paul mentions the function of fellow worker. Here, let’s note the difference between function and identity. In Galatians 3:28, Paul says that: “there is neither male, nor female; for you are all one in Christ Jesus”.
He is not talking here about function in the body of Christ, such as a
pastor who has delegated authority over the congregation or a teacher
who has delegated authority over his students, but rather about the
believer’s identity in Christ regardless of gender.
All
workers have an authority over them, whether a supervisor or a manager
or a department head. Whatever our place of work happens to be, this is
the way any organization functions, through transferred responsibility
at different levels, each one having their respective authority.
III. Role of the woman
Now
let’s see what Paul says about authority in the Church regarding the
role of women. In I Timothy 2:12, Paul gives this injunction: “But I
suffer not a woman to teach, nor to usurp authority over the man”. If we
apply this general principle and survey the New
Testament
writings, we will find ample passages to show us that women played a
very active role in the development of the New Testament church.
In Acts 2:17, Peter reiterating Joel prophecy said: “In the last days, God says, I will pour my spirit on all people. Your sons and daughters will prophesy”.
In
Acts 21:9; we learn that Philip, the evangelist had four unmarried
daughters who prophesied. From the wording in I Corinthians 11:5, we can
infer that women were allowed to prophesy, provided they wore a symbol
of the man’s authority over their head.
In the New Testament, women were allowed to pray and to teach in the church.
Titus 2:3 reveals to us that he, Titus was commanded to “teach
the older women to … teach what is good. Then they can train the
younger women to love their husbands and children… and to be subject to
their husbands, so no one will malign the Word of God”.
In addition, they could exercise their gifts of mercy, helps and I suppose that of giving and administration.
In
all, the only function they couldn’t perform was that of an elder or
that of a pastor. Why? I believe it is because these two callings
involve exercising authority over not only a man (her husband) if she is
married but also over the other men in the assembly who, if they wanted
to apply the Word of God to their lives couldn’t and wouldn’t have
subjected themselves to a woman’s authority, thus creating divisions in
the church.
Again,
we see the protective hand of God in not having a woman ordained as
pastor because usually a pastor is in a most difficult position since he
is Satan’s prime target and carries a tremendous responsibility to his
flock.
The
Bible doesn’t mention anything about women’s natural abilities and
skills that would make them suitable to lead a congregation. Rather, God
uses willing and available men and women empowered by the Holy Spirit
to raise up a people of His own choosing. It is very clear that He
chooses us and not we, ourselves.
Hebrews 5:4 states that: “No one (talking about priests) takes the honor to himself, but receives it when he is called by God, even as Aaron was”.
You might argue that this refers back to Old Testament teaching. But I
do not know of a passage in the Epistles of the New Testament where God
called a woman to be the pastor of a congregation. If the instructions
found in the New Testament are given to us as guidelines and patterns to
be applied for the building, equipping and proper functioning of the
Church, I don’t see how some women can claim to be called to serve in a
function that obviously is not mentioned in the Epistles.
Are
we to obey God in everything else, but not on this debatable point of
conflict resulting in arguments that do not have any ground in the
Scriptures to stand on? It sounds to me like the forbidden fruit that
was offered to Eve by Satan in the Garden of Eden.
It
is interesting that in I Timothy 2:11, Paul links this command of woman
not to have authority over man with the first temptation in the Garden
of Eden. Those are his words: “ A woman should learn in quietness and full submission. I do not permit a woman to teach (men)
or to have authority over a man… for Adam was formed first, then Eve.
And Adam was not the one deceived; it was the woman who was deceived and
became a sinner”.
After
all, Eve could have said to Satan: “I am sorry, but I never make a
decision about trees or fruit without consulting my husband first. He
has been delegated keeper of the garden by God himself; I am happy in my
function of helpmate and I always wait until he tells me if a fruit is
ripe enough to eat or if it is going to give me indigestion or may be
premature death by poisoning.” Or she could have replied: “I am sorry,
but I never eat dinner without my husband. It would be very impolite.
After all, we live in the southern part of the Garden where people are
well known for their genteel manners! There is a good reason for that.
It is listed in the marriage manual under the heading: order of
creation”.
In
any case, she could have used her husband’s role as a protector to
defeat the lies of the devil. One wonders what Adam was doing leaving
his wife alone with a talking serpent. Man is the main one to blame for
Eve’s being deceived.
So
this idea that women and wife can act independently of man and husband,
regardless of the order of God in creation is nothing new, it goes back
to the fall of Mankind.
IV. Paul’s Arguments
Now
in case somebody might think that it was just in the Old Testament or
that it is a chauvinistic attitude on the part of backward, women-hating
men who wrote into the Bible what the customs of the times dictated
regarding the treatment of women, Paul wrote in I Corinthians
11:3-12,16:
“But
I would have you know, that the head of every man is Christ; and the
head of the woman is the man; and the head of Christ is God.
4 Every man praying or prophesying, having his head covered, dishonoureth his head.
5
But every woman that prayeth or prophesieth with her head uncovered
dishonoureth her head: for that is even all one as if she were shaven.
6
For if the woman be not covered, let her also be shorn: but if it be a
shame for a woman to be shorn or shaven, let her be covered.
7
For a man indeed ought not to cover his head, forasmuch as he is the
image and glory of God: but the woman is the glory of the man.
8 For the man is not of the woman; but the woman of the man.
9 Neither was the man created for the woman; but the woman for the man.
10 For this cause ought the woman to have power on her head because of the angels.
11 Nevertheless neither is the man without the woman, neither the woman without the man, in the Lord.
12 For as the woman is of the man, even so is the man also by the woman; but all things of God.
13 Judge in yourselves: is it comely that a woman pray unto God uncovered?
14 Doth not even nature itself teach you, that, if a man have long hair, it is a shame unto him?
15 But if a woman have long hair, it is a glory to her: for her hair is given her for a covering.
16 But if any man seem to be contentious, we have no such custom, neither the churches of God”.
So
here Paul gives the proper recognition to women as being the glory of
man. Are we not blessed in that? Why should women be put down when God
says that she is our glory?
I
may be wrong, but it seems to me that Paul refers to hair as a symbol
of covering for women to illustrate the more obvious point of his
teaching which is that men have delegated authority and duty from God,
as servants, to care, protect and provide for their wives and their
Christians sisters in general. It certainly is nothing demeaning to the
women. And to reinforce his point, he adds in verse 10: “and because of the angels, the woman ought to have a sign of authority on her head”.
You
might point out that Paul while teaching women to wear long hair as a
covering declares that it is a shame for a man to wear long hair; maybe
because it was a Greek custom to have short hair. This passage really
argues in favor of Paul being flexible and adapting to the cultural
context of his time.
Here
Paul is not opinionated or narrow in his assessment of the situation.
As a church planter and an apostle, he had great concern for the welfare
of his spiritual children. He was referring at this point to the
shaven head of the Corinthian prostitutes and wanted the testimony of
Christian women to be blameless. We are to avoid the appearance of evil.
So it was not a matter of being legalistic.
In
Revelation chapter 2:15 John mentions the Nicolaitans. They are
mentioned twice, forming a marriage of the Church and the world, through
the ordination of a supposedly superior clergy elite class ruling or
lording over a supposedly inferior laity, the spiritually uneducated
masses if you will. This in Greek is the meaning of Nico and Laitan. It
begins with a compromise and ends in powerlessness and destruction when
the Lord judges and removes the candlestick of such churches.
Who
were these Nicolaitans? It is supposed that this group whose name is
derived from a man named Nicolas, compromised with pagan practices in
order to allow Christians to associate with popular customs.
Does it remind you of another time in Israel´s
history when the people wanted a King like the other nations around
them and rejected God´s rule. God told them that their King would lord
it over them. This is exactly what happened to the institution of the
church through the ages, the clergy, a separate hierarchical class of
trained ministers, taking the control of God´s people through different
methods that are not from God and are not recorded in His Word.
We born again believers are ALL individually part of the body of Christ and as corporate members, living stones in the temple according to New Testament teaching, none of us superior to the
other. I Peter 2:5 reads: New American Standard Bible
"you
also, as living stones, are being built up as a spiritual house for a
holy priesthood, to offer up spiritual sacrifices acceptable to God
through Jesus Christ."
In the last half of the twentieth century more so pervasively
and rapidly than before, the Church has been infiltrated by the world’s
philosophy of Satan´s seed and has found a most welcome reception in the
more liberal elements in its ranks.
Now
in 2012, it has invaded almost all church denominations and movements.
One of the strongest influence has been the secular feminist movement, allied with
the lesbian agenda and witchcraft principles and practices which have also
been embraced and whose tenets have gone into practices in all but the
most conservative Bible believing churches in the United States and elsewhere in the world.
This
is exactly what Paul, Peter and John were warning their flocks about.
In Revelation chapter 2, the teaching of Balaam is mentioned in the same
paragraph as the teaching of the Nicolaitans. To study more about this,
see 2 Peter 2:15 and Jude 11.
Of
course, this practice in the churches is not new. Since the absorption
of pagan practices in the church under Roman Emperors Constantine’s and
Theodosius’ reigns resulting in a syncretism which has permeated the
church until now, we have witnessed this phenomenon in the modern church
that will culminate in the unification of all the apostate ecumenical
churches under the rule of Antichrist during the greatest deception ever
perpetrated on mankind. This is why Paul in verse 16 of chapter 11
says: “If anyone wants to be contentious about this, we have no other
practice—nor do the churches of God.
As
far as I know, God has not rescinded His commands to the Church. He has
not changed one iota of His perfect, pure, eternal, unchanging Word. He
still keeps on building His Church on the perfect, indestructible “foundation of the apostles and prophets with Christ Jesus himself as the chief cornerstone”. Ephesians 2:20.
Maybe
our human hands build buildings imperfectly on faulty foundations that
will crack and not support the weight. Not so with the Lord and his
Word. Everything He creates and builds is perfect. We do not need to try
and improve on it.
Furthermore, there are warnings throughout the Bible for those who would try and change it. Deuteronomy 4:2 declares: “do not add to what I command you and do not subtract from it, but keep the commands of the Lord your God that I give you”.
Several other passages give the same command, with consequences added in the case of Revelation 22:19: “And
if anyone takes words away from this book of prophecy, God will take
away from him his share in the tree of life and in the holy city, which
are described in this book.”
Further
in 2 Corinthians 10:8, Paul continues with this theme after explaining
to us the good use of his authority when he declares: “For even if I boast somewhat freely about the authority the Lord gave us for building you up rather than pulling you down, I will not be ashamed of it”. We can see from these words that Paul always had his disciples’ best interest at heart.
Then,
in chapter 11:3 of the same letter, after talking about his motive for
exhorting his fellow Christians, Paul introduces false teachers and
their teachings by referring to the fact that Eve was the one to be
deceived.
Conclusion
Brothers
and sisters, let us beware of practices prohibited by God in His Word,
first introduced by people outside and inside the Church who distort the
Scriptures to back up these practices and later on formulate a false
theology once the practice has been entrenched in the lives of people.
True
Christian practices should always have as their basis pure, sound
doctrine and should stem from biblical principles and the leading of the
Holy Spirit who will never contradict His Word. Sound teaching should
always precede good practices, not the other way around because the
human heart is so deceitful. Let’s leave this type of behavior to the
politicians who have perfected it to an art.
Jean-Louis.
